Legal Opinion
James Edgar Motto v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 13, 1966No. 43-64PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam :
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Marion T. Bennett under Rule 4-7 (c) for a determination in further proceedings of the amount of recovery due plaintiff on entry of an order of the court on July 16, 1965, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denying defendant’s cross-motion, 172 Ct. Cl. 192, 348 F. 2d 523. On March 10,1966, the commissioner filed a report consisting of findings of fact and a recommended conclusion of law. On March 30, 1966, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement wherein it was stipulated that the court should enter judgment in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Fitzsimmons v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. PeelerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Dilley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Marine Overseas Services, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Crossocean Shipping Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, Muhammadi Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Sheridon H. Groves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Francis M. Marley v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.