State of Nevada Ex Rel. Boyle v. State Board of Examiners
Nevada Supreme Court
Original application for the writ of mandate. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. (Oral argument. No brief on file.) (Oral argument. No brief on file.)
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Belknap, J.:
This is an application for a writ of mandamus requiring the board of examiners to'order the publication of certain proposed amendments to the constitution of the state, preliminary to their submission to the people at the approaching general election. The proposed amendments are fourteen in number, and are those which were submitted to a vote of the people at the special election, held upon the 11th day of February, 1889, under the provisions of a law providing for such election, approved January 19, 1889. (Stat. 1889, p. 14.)
' The application is made upon the ground…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edmonds v. BanburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Dells v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- State Ex Rel. Whitney v. FindlayNevada Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gillesby v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Ana Maria Sugar Co. v. QuinonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Caton v. FrankNevada Supreme Court · 1935
- Beebe v. KoontzNevada Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Schur v. PayneNevada Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.