Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schur v. Payne

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1937No. 3172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Taber, J.:

Original proceeding in mandamus. The facts in the petition are not challenged, but respondent, on general demurrer, took the position that the petition failed to state facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of the writ.

Relator will also be designated as petitioner herein. When the petition was filed (September 17, 1936), he was, and for some seven years had been, a citizen of the United States, over twenty-one years of age, and a resident of Clark County. On said 17th day of September 1936, and for more than ten days immediately prior thereto, he was a resident…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olive v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Saunders v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Piper v. GraceyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Humboldt County v. County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1870

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. BreithauptNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State ex rel. Brazda v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tennent v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. MacDonald v. City of HendersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Masto v. MonteroNevada Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API