Legal Opinion

Caton v. Frank

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1935No. 3108PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Dysart, District Judge:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel respondents to proceed upon a petition signed by a number of the qualified voters of the city of Reno to amend the present charter of the city of Reno, which would change the present city charter from a charter providing for a mayor and five city councilmen to a city managerial form of government.

Upon the petition as filed, an alternative writ of mandate was issued out of and under the seal of this court directing the said respondents to appear and show cause before this court, at the courtroom…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. State ex rel. McCue v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. JonNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Moore v. Rochester Weaver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Viale v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lundberg v. KoontzNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. v. DraneyNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gilbert v. BreithauptNevada Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API