Legal Opinion

Sneeden v. City of Marion

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 21, 1932No. 4494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHAM, District Judge.

By his bill the plaintiff, receiver of the City National Bank of Herrin, seeks to have the delivery and pledge'of certain bonds by said bank to secure a deposit prior to the appointment of the receiver, of funds of the city of Marion, 111., by Ray C. Carroll, as city treasurer, held an illegal and ultra vires act on the part of said bank and its officers; to have the defendants enjoined from disposing of said bonds and to have the same returned to the plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that the pledge of assets of the bank to secure a deposit was not only beyond the power of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens Trust & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Ward v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Cameron v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pottorff v. El Paso-Hudspeth Counties Road Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PottorffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Haynes v. City of WoodwardDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API