Legal Opinion

Haynes v. City of Woodward

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1934No. 4911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, District Judge.

The stipulation filed herein waives trial hy jury and admits all jurisdictional facts, that the plaintiff is the receiver of the First National Bank of Woodward, Okl., which bank failed on the 18th day of January, 1932; that the treasurer of the city of Woodward had deposited to the credit of said treasurer with said bank at the time it failed the sum of $145,450.88; that there had been delivered to said treasurer, to secure payment of said deposits by said bank, bonds in the sum of $120,000, $28,000 of which were Woodward, Okl., bonds and $92,000 of which were United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Marion v. SneedenSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  3. Sneeden v. City of Marion, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MaryLand v. KokrdaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Sneeden v. City of MarionDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Inv. Co. v. Town of Snow Hill, N. C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Kavanaugh v. FashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Leslie v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API