Legal Opinion
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Pottorff
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1933No. 6748PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This Case, and the case just decided, Pottorff, Receiver, v. El Paso-Hudspeth Counties Road District of Texas (C. C. A.) 62 F.(2d) 498, involving the validity and the enforceability against the receiver of a contract of the hank pledging some of its assets to se-' *2cure a depositor, in the one case of private, in the other of public, funds, are companion cases. They were tried in the same court at the same time.
Appellee urged in the court below, and urges here, in each of the cases, that the agreement under which the securities were pledged is invalid and unenforceable…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Aldrich v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carcaba v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MaryLand v. KokrdaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Birdsell Mfg. Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Brennan v. HoldenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.