Legal Opinion
Carrillo v. Goldberg
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 19, 2013No. AC 34075PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*302 Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiffs, Luis Carrillo and Sandra Carrillo, appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding them damages and interest for the failure of the defendants, Keith Goldberg and Leigh Ann Goldberg, to return their security deposit upon the termination of their lease in violation of General Statutes § 47 a-21 (d), punitive damages and attorney’s fees pursuant to the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and interest pursuant to General Statutes § 52-192a. The plaintiffs claim that the court erred in (1) declining to award…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Blumenthal v. Kimber Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Ramin v. RaminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Meribear Prods., Inc. v. FrankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Pedrini v. KiltonicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Lappostato v. TerkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Fezollari v. JauzovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Gianetti v. GombosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.