Legal Opinion

Gianetti v. Gombos

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 23, 2013No. AC 34099PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

After reviewing the record and considering the issue presented by the self-represented plaintiff, Charles D. Gianetti, a physician, in this appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the self-represented defendants, David E. Gombos and Catherine W. Gombos, we are not persuaded that the court committed reversible error.1

The judgment is affirmed.

The plaintiff has presented us with a limited record; see, e.g., Practice Book § 61-10; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bertrand, 140 Conn. App. 646, 654, 59 A.3d 864 (2013); and a brief that fails to identify, discuss…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BertrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Carrillo v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gianetti v. DunsbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Gianetti v. DunsbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API