Legal Opinion
Pedrini v. Kiltonic
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 24, 2017No. AC37929PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
In this landlord-tenant case, the plaintiff, Lacey Pedrini, appeals from the judgment of the trial court returning to her $1094.81, a portion of her security deposit plus interest. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to award her double the amount of her security deposit pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 2011) § 47a-21 (d) (2); (2) failing to find that the actions of the defendant, Eleanor Kiltonic, constituted a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and, therefore, failing to assess…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Muniz v. KravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pointe Residential Builders BH, LLC v. TMP Construction Group, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- United Concrete Products, Inc. v. NJR Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Onofrio v. MineriConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Featherston v. Katchko & Son Construction Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Herron v. DanielsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.