Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Kuhwald

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 16, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from the denial by the Court of Chancery of a petition to enjoin the defendant from engaging in the practice of optometry.1

I

The Trial Court found the following facts as being undisputed:

“Defendant is an optician who supplies contact lenses pursuant to a prescription written by an ophthalmologist. After receiving the prescription from the ophthalmologist, Defendant performs certain acts in examining and measuring the eye and obtaining data necessary for the preparation of the contact lenses. The lenses are actually prepared by another party (a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Delaware Optometric Corporation v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  4. State Ex Inf. Danforth v. Dale Curteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. Moss v. KuhwaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Figgs v. Bellevue Holding Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. In Re KennedySupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Wyoming State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wyoming State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API