Legal Opinion

Delaware Optometric Corporation v. Sherwood

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 23, 1957PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Justice:

This appeal presents the basic question of whether or not licensed optometrists may enjoin the practice of optometry by unlicensed persons. The Vice Chancellor on the motion of the defendants dismissed the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs' proof and from that judgment the plaintiffs have appealed.

The plaintiffs are a corporation containing as its members twenty-four out of a total of twenty-seven practicing optometrists in the State of Delaware and three individual licensed optometrists.

*225The defendants are opticians and are not licensed optometrists. They concede for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Unger v. Landlords' Management Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Dworken v. Apartment House Owners Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. In Re Appeal of Infotechnology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Severns v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API