Legal Opinion

In Re Kennedy

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 19, 1982PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

This proceeding involves a judicial review of Interpretive Guideline No. 2 of Disciplinary Rule 9-102 which governs the conduct of members of the Delaware Bar, Del.C., Yol. 16, p. 590; Supreme Court Rule 66 relating to the Clients’ Security Trust Fund; and Regulation IV(13) of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund, Del.C., Yol. 16, p. 632.

I

The parties to the litigation are John B. Kennedy, a Delaware lawyer (respondent), and the Censor Committee of the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (Censor Committee). See Rule 62. In a proceeding before the Censor Committee, the parties…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  2. In Re KennedySupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Deutsch v. CoganCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1990
  4. Matter of RawsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API