Farmers & Merchs.' Bank of L.A. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. B. Mathews, City Attorney, and Hartley Shaw, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action brought by plaintiff, a banking corporation, to recover from the city of Los Angeles the sum of $4,235.96, alleged to have been paid by plaintiff under protest for illegal taxes for the fiscal year 1902-1903. A general demurrer for want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was interposed to the complaint and overruled. An answer denying certain allegations of the complaint having been filed, the cause was tried, and judgment went for plaintiff. Defendant appeals upon the judgment-roll.
It is contended that the complaint is fatally defective because it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCann v. Sierra CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Rhoda v. Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1877
- Alden v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Arbios v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bigelow v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.