Legal Opinion
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1989No. CV-89-0033-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
We review the court of appeals’ decision setting aside an award in a workers’ compensation case. The court held the evidence did not support the award because the doctors’ testimony on which the administrative law judge presumably based her finding lacked an adequate factual foundation. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3); A.R.S. §§ 12-120.24 and 23-948. We granted review because we believe the court of appeals erred in applying law to fact. See Rule 23, Ariz.R. Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
On April 5, 1986, William Steele…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. CanoArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ZmichArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BayArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Western Bonded Products v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kaibab Industries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Aguayo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- RYN, Inc. v. Platte County Memorial Hospital Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.