Legal Opinion
Kaibab Industries v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 16, 2000No. 1 CA-IC 99-0068PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 This is a special-action review of an Industrial Commission award and decision upon review reopening a 1995 back-injury claim of Kim Sinks. The issue raised is the application of the Arizona successive-injury doctrine to an out-of-state worker’s compensation claim. See Ariz. R.P. Spec. Act. 10 (Supp.1999). We affirm the award and decision upon review.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Ms. Sinks sustained three separate industrial injuries between 1994 and 1997. The first two injuries occurred in Arizona; the last, in Utah. Specifically, the first one…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hampton v. M'connelSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Putz v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Sun Valley Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Southwest Desert Images, LLC v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Barnella v. island/wescoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- C2 enterprises/berkshire v. MongeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.