Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-1037PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Cincinnati asserts that the records are exempt from release as trial preparation records. We hold the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in holding that the police department’s homicide investigative files in this case did not qualify as exempt “trial preparation records” under R.C. 149.43(A)(4). Hence, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

R.C. 149.43 mandates the release of public records, but excepts a “trial preparation record.” R.C. 149.43(A)(4) provides: “ ‘Trial preparation record’ means any record that contains information that is specifically compiled in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Zuern v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Franklin County Sheriff's Department v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Williams v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API