Legal Opinion
Robertson v. Drew
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1917No. Civ. No. 1895PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
Plaintiff prosecuted this appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action on a lease to recover rent.
In August, 1913, plaintiff leased certain premises to the defendant for the term of one year from August 11, 1913, with the privilege to defendant of “renewing the lease” for a further term of from one to five years. On August 11, 1914, the defendant wrote a letter to the plaintiff stating in part that he had elected to take the premises for a further period of two years. On August 21st the plaintiff replied to this letter saying: “If you will call at the office we will fix you…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howell v. City of Hamburg Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- McGlynn v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Shamp v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- San Pedro Salt Co. v. Hauser Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Bergin v. Van Der SteenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Helena Light & Ry. Co. v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
- Beatty Safway Scaffold, Inc. v. SkrableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.