San Pedro Salt Co. v. Hauser Packing Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
On August 26, 1905, plaintiff contracted in writing to deliver to defendant during the ensuing year two hundred tons of salt at the price of $5 per ton as therein stipulated. The contract contained a provision to the effect that the defendant should have the option to renew the agreement for a second year, but failed to specify the time within which defendant should elect to renew the agreement. By its terms the contract expired on August 27, 1906. Within the year following such expiration plaintiff delivered to defendant a certain amount of salt alleged to be of the reasonable market value…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thiebaud v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Renoud v. DaskamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Shamp v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bergin v. Van Der SteenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Robertson v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Rutledge & Taylor Coal Co. v. Mermod, Jaccard & King Jewelry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
- Sonico v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021