Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Preston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1926No. Appeal, 100PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendants appealed from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, in an action of trespass for deceit, and assign as error only the refusal of their point for binding instructions, and the dismissal of their motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Under such circumstances, all the evidence and inferences therefrom, favorable to plaintiff, must be taken as true, and all unfavorable to him, if depending solely on testimony, must be rejected: Mitchell v. City of New Castle, 275 Pa. 426; Fluke v. Lang, 283 Pa. 54.

The statement of claim sets forth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fluke v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Gillespie v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Mitchell v. City of New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Bruce v. LoebSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Smith v. Citizens Insurance & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Scalet v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Tilghman v. DollenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Vendig v. Union League of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Dalgleish v. Oppenheim, Collins & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API