Legal Opinion

Fluke v. Lang

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1925No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Appellees made a contract with the tenant in possession of a store, forming part of one of appellant’s properties, to construct a new front and to fit up the leased portion for the purpose of a business which it is claimed the tenant proposed to carry on at that place. Not being paid for their work, plaintiffs filed a mechanic’s lien against the entire property, naming the owner and tenant as defendants; a scire facias was issued and plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment thereon; from the latter, the present appeal was taken.

The right to maintain the lien…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Dyer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Scheer v. MelvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Fuller v. Stewart Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Russell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Commonwealth v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Murray v. ZemonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API