Legal Opinion

Dalgleish v. Oppenheim, Collins & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1930No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

At the time in question, the defendant corporation, Oppenheim, Collins & Company, were proprietors of a store in Pittsburgh, the rear of which contained a retail shoe department. On the afternoon of December 20, 1928, the original plaintiff, Catherine L. Dalgleish, seventy years of age, entered the store to buy a pair of galoshes and, while walking along an aisle to reach that department, fell and was seriously injured. The mere fact that plaintiff fell and was hurt while in defendant’s store, without more, would not render it liable therefor: Gorman v. Brahm’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Gorman v. Simon Brahm's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Huey v. GahlenbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Claim of Miller v. National Cabinet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Morris v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Flora v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Nelson v. SmeltzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  5. Clark v. Glosser Bros. Department Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API