Legal Opinion

Vendig v. Union League of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1927No. Appeals, 278, 279 and 291PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

As authorized by the Act of June 29, 1923, P. L. 981, plaintiff brought a single suit against two defendants, claiming she had been injured by reason of the negligence of both of them. She recovered a verdict against both, which the court in banc reduced in amount and then sustained as to one, but directed judgment non obstante veredicto to be entered in favor of the other. From the judgments entered accordingly, these three appeals were taken; the first by one of the defendants, from the refusal to enter a judgment non obstante veredicto in its favor; the second…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Cleary v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Dunbar v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Martin v. LetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Bremer v. W. W. Smith, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Brown Hotel Co., Inc. v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Jamison v. KamererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API