Turpen v. Turlock Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. William 0. Minor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The action was brought to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s land caused by the seepage of water from the canal of the defendant corporation, and for an injunction. Special issues in reference to the damages caused by the seepage were submitted to a jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $475. Findings were also filed and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied, and the appeal is taken by said defendant corporation from the order denying a new trial.
It is contended by the attorney for appellant that…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Howell v. Big Horn Basin Colonization Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Calvert v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.