Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Mascia

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 18, 1962PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

In this action, the plaintiff sought an injunction to restrain the defendant from erecting and maintaining a fence or barrier dividing properties owned by the parties. The plaintiff also claimed damages. He alleged that the parties had made an agreement that no fence should be erected between the properties except by mutual agreement and that the defendant had begun to erect a fence in contravention of the agreement. The defendant, in his answer, denied the material allegations of the complaint. The court found the issues for the plaintiff and granted injunctive relief as requested. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Brainard v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Dave Greytak Enterprises, Inc. v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API