Legal Opinion

State v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1988No. C87-02-31137; CA A45225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals from an amended judgment which modified his sentence for escape in the second degree from two and one-half to five years. Defendant contends that the trial court did not have authority to amend the judgment and that, in the absence of authority, the modification constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. ORS 138.050. We affirm.

On May 4, 1987, defendant appeared for sentencing on the escape conviction and for a probation violation hearing involving two previous convictions. The court imposed a five-year sentence on the escape conviction, revoked the earlier probation and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. FiesterOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hubbard v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PinkowskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Peterson v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. GoldingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API