Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1990No. C89-01-30399, C89-01-30509, C89-01-30409, C89-01-30511 CA A62574 (Control), CA A62575, CA A62828, CA A62829Published

1Concurrence

EDMONDS, J.,

specially concurring.

The majority correctly says that defendant’s appeal is governed by ORS 138.050, which provides that an appeal from a sentence on a plea of guilty or no contest shall only be on the grounds that the sentence exceeds the maximum allowable by law or is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual. However, the majority errs when it holds that defendant does not make a claim that his sentences exceed the maximum allowed by law.

*585Defendant argues:

“The trial court erred in modifying Defendant’s original sentences, by imposing a minimum term of two-and-one-half years, after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. BlaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API