Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Hubbard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This appeal raises the question of the validity of a nunc pro tunc decree making an allowance for minor children in a divorce suit.

The parties are Caroline Hill Hubbard, the executrix of the estate of James W. Hubbard, deceased, who was the plaintiff in the divorce suit, and Pearl Hubbard Bootsman, formerly Pearl Hubbard, the defendant in such suit. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as the executrix and the defendant.

On February 1, 1939, the court entered a decree granting the defendant a divorce upon her cross-complaint in a suit for divorce commenced by her husband, who defaulted.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Potter Realty Co. v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Cloyes v. EckernOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cochran v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Braat v. AndrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Aylett v. MardisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Johnson v. OverbayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API