Legal Opinion

State v. Fiester

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1897PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Josephine: Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. Charles Fiester appeals from a conviction of murder.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

1. It is contended that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the indictment. This accusation, in specifying the means made use of to .accomplish the alleged purpose, charges that the «defendant “did then and there feloniously, purpose*256ly, and of deliberate and premeditated malice kill Nancy E. Fiester, by then and there beating her with his fists, and by choking her, and by pushing and dragging her into the water, and holding her under the water, whereby she was drowned,” etc. The statute, in prescribing the method of charging an offense, declares: “The indictment must charge but one…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1884

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. ReynerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. PutneyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. OttenOregon Supreme Court · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API