State v. Wiik
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of furnishing liquor to a minor, a Class A misdemeanor. Two assignments of error are made. First, it is claimed that defendant was deprived of his right to a jury trial. Our disposition of this case makes it unneccessary to discuss the facts or the second assignment of error.
After defendant was arrested and charged with the crime, his attorney made a written request for a jury trial as provided by Jackson County District Court Rule 5.6. However, defense counsel did not appear at pretrial conference. Rule 5.13 of Jackson County District Court Rules…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. NaughtenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. Van LieuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- LaMarche v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. CassadaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.