Legal Opinion

Engel v. Scully & Scully, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 14, 2011No. 10 Civ. 3167(PKC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge:

Plaintiff Paul Engel brings this putative class action against defendant Scully & Scully, Inc., under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g). Engel has moved for class certification under Rule 23, Fed.R.Civ.P., and the defendant opposes and moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part, and the plaintiffs motion for class certification is granted.

BACKGROUND

On December 4, 2003, Congress enacted FACTA, which…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Northern Leasing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Pagan v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Roman Catholic Archdiocese v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API