Legal Opinion
Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 3, 2018No. 16-16486; 16-16783PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal was brought to contest the approval of a class-action settlement. Dr. David Muransky filed a class action against Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. for violating the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act ("FACTA"). Appellants James Price and Eric Isaacson ("the objectors") objected to a class settlement reached by Dr. Muransky and Godiva. Over their objections, the District Court approved the settlement, class counsel's request for attorney's fees, and an incentive award for Dr. Muransky. After careful review and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ahmed Kamal v. J. Crew Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Duncan v. FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Lee v. Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- McCloud v. Save-A-Lot Knoxville, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Blumenfeld v. Regions BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.