Legal Opinion
Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 22, 2019No. 16-16486; 16-16783PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge:
We sua sponte vacate our previous opinion and publish this one in its place. For ease of reading, the major change is to Part II.B, our discussion of Dr. Muransky's standing to bring this action.
This appeal was brought to contest the approval of a class-action settlement. Dr. David Muransky filed a class action against Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. for violating the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act ("FACTA"). Appellants James Price and Eric Isaacson ("the objectors") objected to a class settlement reached by Dr. Muransky and Godiva. Over their objections, the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Melito v. Experian Mktg. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Ne. Eng'rs Fed. Credit Union v. Home Depot, Inc. (In Re Home Depot Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Doris Jeffries v. Volume Services America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Amrhein v. eClinical Works, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Denece Thomas v. TOMS King (Ohio), LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.