Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Holman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 1982No. 21627PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent Holman is a duly licensed attorney in the State of South Carolina, previously practicing law in Cherokee County. On February 16,1981, he was convicted in the general sessions court of Cherokee for contempt of court. No appeal was taken from this conviction. On March 12, 1981, this Court temporarily suspended respondent’s license to practice law pursuant to § 6C of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure.

This grievance action charges Holman with misconduct under § 15B, 15C and 16 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure. The Panel Hearing and the Executive Committee determined Holman to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Matter of RishSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. In re CaskeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Matter of Van WinterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BreinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In the Matter of JenretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. In the Matter of TedderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. In re JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. In the Matter of WarlickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API