Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Jenrette

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1986No. 22519PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law following his conviction in federal court of bribery and conspiracy. The hearing panel and Executive Committee recommended disbarment. We agree disbarment is the appropriate sanction.

The facts which led to respondent’s conviction are reported in United States v. Jenrette, 744 F. (2d) 817 (D. C. Cir. 1984). The only matter to be determined is the appropriate sanction to be imposed. Rule 6(C), Rule on Disciplinary Procedure.

At the time of his criminal activity, respondent was a United States Congressman from the Sixth Congressional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of GallowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. In the Matter of HolmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of LempesisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. In the Matter of PerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. In re JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API