Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Warlick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 1985No. 22418PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law on November 9, 1983, following his conviction in federal court for contempt. The Executive Committee, by a divided vote, recommended respondent be disbarred. We agree respondent should be disbarred.

*381In preparation for a personal injury trial in federal court, respondent hired a private investigator to conduct a jury investigation. The investigator’s activities included personal contacts with jurors and their family members. Respondent was aware of the personal contact, and was questioned about the propriety of his actions by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Two Anonymous Members of the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Matter of RishSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. In the Matter of HolmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. In the Matter of RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WarlickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. In the Matter of WarlickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API