Legal Opinion

Norton & Ellis, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 6, 1964No. C.D. 2440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in the case at bar, with the exception of that covered by protest 59/12489 herein, is described on the invoices covered thereby as Polycolle PK-1. It was assessed with duty at the rate of 3% cents per pound and 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 27(a) (4) (5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as *77modified, as a mixture consisting in part of a product provided for in said paragraph 27, it appearing that said product contained 5 percent of a coal-tar-plasticizer (plaintiff’s exhibit 1, R. 11).

The merchandise covered by protest 59/12489 is described as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. United States v. Draeger Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Ultra Ray Pearl Essence Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alloys Unlimited, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Naftone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. United States v. Naftone, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API