Norton & Ellis, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
The merchandise involved in the case at bar, with the exception of that covered by protest 59/12489 herein, is described on the invoices covered thereby as Polycolle PK-1. It was assessed with duty at the rate of 3% cents per pound and 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 27(a) (4) (5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as *77modified, as a mixture consisting in part of a product provided for in said paragraph 27, it appearing that said product contained 5 percent of a coal-tar-plasticizer (plaintiff’s exhibit 1, R. 11).
The merchandise covered by protest 59/12489 is described as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- United States v. Draeger Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Ultra Ray Pearl Essence Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alloys Unlimited, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Naftone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- United States v. Naftone, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976