Application of Jiri Farkas and Frantisek Sorm

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of product claims 3 and 4 and process claims 5-7 in appellants’ application 1 entitled “Preparation of 5-Bis-(|3-chlor-ethyl)-Aminomethyl Uracil Hydrochloride.”

The invention as claimed relates to 5-bis-(|3-chloroethyl)-aminomethyl uracil, its hydrochloride, and a method of producing the latter compound. Claim 3 is representative of the product claims:

3. 5-bis-(|3-chlorethyl)-aminomethyl-uracil. Appellants react 5-chloromethyl uracil with bis-(|3-ehloroethyl)-amine to obtain the claimed…