Legal Opinion

Application of Herman Hoeksema

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 4, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7050PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. T , WORLEY, Chief Judge,

Hoeksema appeals from an affirmanceby the board of the rejection of claims 1 to H, 13 to 15 and 17 to 19 of his application1 for a patent on “Composition, of Matter and Process.”

The invention relates to the antibiotic-dihydronovobiocin and its preparation. According to appellant’s specification novobiocin exists in two crystalline forms-with only one structural formula, but-somewhat different physical properties. Appellant explains that Form 1 is readily absorbed into the blood stream fromaqueous vehicles, but Form 2 is not. Since administering novobiocin in aqueous…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Application of Jiri Farkas and Frantisek SormCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of Noel F. AlbertsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of Noel F. AlbertsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API