Legal Opinion

Application of Victor v. D'ancicco, William G. Collings and Daniel Robert Shine

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 3, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8460PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 4, 5, 9, 10, and 12 in appellants’ application serial No. 520,085, filed January 12, 1966, as a continuation-in-part of their copending application, serial No. 120,524, filed June 29, 1961, for rigid polyurethane foams and a method for making them. We affirm.

THE INVENTION

The methods recited in claims 9 and 10 for making the products recited in claims 4 and 5 comprise the reaction of specified polyisocyanates and specified polyhydroxy compounds. The foams and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Jiri Farkas and Frantisek SormCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re RinehartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. In re FentonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. In re KlosakCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. In re PalmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API