Legal Opinion

Partola Manufacturing Co. v. General Chemical Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHogan, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. The trial justice before whom the case was tried made findings of fact and conclusions of law wherein he awarded to the defendant judgment on the plaintiff’s cause of action, and to the plaintiff judgment against the defendant on the counterclaim set up in defendant’s answer. Upon appeal, the Appellate Division, as appears by the order of reversal, unanimously decided that the findings of fact in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff’s cause of action were not supported by evidence; that the counterclaim of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Wolfert v. . Caledonia Springs Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Seneca Distributing Co. v. . FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Schnibbe v. GlenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Duluth Superior Milling Co. v. BinenstockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Jaslow v. Waterbury Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API