Legal Opinion

Duluth Superior Milling Co. v. Binenstock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1932No. Appeal 15PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

On July 28,1930, in the City of Philadelphia, Duluth-Superior Milling Company entered into a written contract with defendant, whereby defendant agreed to purchase from plaintiff, and plaintiff agreed to sell defendant, two hundred and ten barrels of flour at a certain price per barrel, “F. O. B. ’Warehouse.” The contract named Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the “destination,” “allowed” freight to that point, and provided: “Time of shipment within thirty days;” and “terms of payment as used, draft with shipper’s order bill of lading attached.” It was drawn on a printed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Sharpsville Furnace Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Partola Manufacturing Co. v. General Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Lederle v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Seligman v. BeecherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cochran v. PoseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Hershey Estates v. RettewPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API