Legal Opinion
Jaslow v. Waterbury Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 7, 1924No. 111PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
1. Plaintiff is dissatisfied with the amount of the verdict below and assigns as error the refusal of the District Court to grant a new trial on the grounds set forth in the then section 999 of the New York Code.
Such refusal is not reviewable here. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Carey, 220 Fed. 454, 136 C. C. A. 282.
2Defendant, though pressing its assignment of error for failure by the trial judge to dismiss the complaint or to direct a verdict for defendant, states that it “does not ask for and does not desire a new trial.”
*367Except, however, in some such situation as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Agnello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Pope v. Terre Haute Car & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- The LusitaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jaslow v. Waterbury Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925