Shelly v. Hansen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
In this legal malpractice action against two attorneys who had represented him successively, plaintiff was given a money judgment against defendant Hansen only. Plaintiff has appealed contending not only that the award was inadequate but that he was also entitled to a judgment against defendant Docken. Defendant Hansen has also appealed ; although no challenge is made to the amount of the award, he renews the claim below that the action against him is barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 339, subd. 1). The appeals have been consolidated for disposition pursuant to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Campbell v. MaganaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lally v. KusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.