Legal Opinion

Luat v. Cacho

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1999No. 21432PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

WATANABE, J.

In this appeal, Respondent-Appellant Alain Cacho (Alain) contends that the District Court of the First Circuit (the district court) committed reversible error when it (1) entered an order on November 24, 1997, enjoining him from harassing Petitioner-Ap-pellee Danielle Luat (Danielle) for a period of three years (injunction order); and (2) denied his motion to reconsider the injunction order (motion to reconsider).

In light of the summary nature of the hearing on Danielle’s petition and Alain’s denial, at the hearing, of the allegations of harassment, we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. TrainorHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. John & Jane Roes, 1-100 v. FHP, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CarlsmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Chang v. BercHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Parker v. PUHIHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Duarte v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Hamilton Ex Rel. Lethem v. LethemHawaii Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API