Legal Opinion

John & Jane Roes, 1-100 v. FHP, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1999No. 21504PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiffs-appellants John & Jane Roes 1-100 (hereinafter “plaintiffs”) filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i, alleging, inter alia, (1) negligence and (2) intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress. In December 1997, the plaintiffs and the defendant-appel-lee Continental Micronesia, Inc. (“Continental”) filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment, and the defendant-appellee FHP, Inc. (“FHP”) filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On February 23, 1998, the federal district court conducted…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Leavitt v. Jane L.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ornstein v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Guth v. FreelandHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API