Legal Opinion

Chang v. Berc

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2003No. 24089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that default is not an available remedy when a respondent is ready to submit evidence regarding the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) or an injunction under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 604-10.5 (Supp.2001). Respondent-Appellant Carol Ann Berc (Respondent) is such a respondent and appeals from a January 10, 2001 order denying her motion to set aside default and dissolve an injunction (motion to set aside) entered by the District Court of the Fust Circuit (the court).1 The order arose from a July 7, 2000 petition filed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Compass Development, Inc. v. BlevinsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Ling v. YokoyamaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Luat v. CachoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MURASKO v. LooHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API