Legal Opinion

Mallard v. Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WiNBORNE, J.

“The office of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a pleading, admitting, for the purpose, the truth of the allegations of facts contained therein, and ordinarily relevant inferences of fact, necessarily deducible therefrom, are also admitted . . .” Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N. C., 517, 142 S. E., 761; Toler v. French, 213 N. C., 360, 196 S. E., 32; Ins. Co. v. McCraw, 215 N. C., 105, 1 S. E. (2d), 369; Parks v. Princeton, 217 N. C., 361, 8 S. E. (2d), 217; Merrell v. Stuart, 220 N. C., 326, 17 S. E. (2d), 458. Hence, considering the sufficiency of a complaint, when tested by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Toler v. . FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Parks v. Town of PrincetonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Merrell v. . StuartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API