State v. Saunders
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The State’s evidence relative to the plans to commit the offenses charged and the means by which they were carried out consisted of the testimony of Kraeuter, the accomplice, and of B. B. Price, the victim. However, the defendant, on cross-examination, made many admissions tending to support Kraeuter’s story. He admitted he and Waldemaier had been in partnership; that Waldemaier took Kraeuter and another man to the defendant’s home in Washington on Monday preceding the hold-up; that the defendant took Kraeuter to his basement (where Kraeuter testified the plans were made). He admitted riding…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Harper Furniture Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Mallard v. . Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. PaigeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.