Toler v. . French
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The question: Did the court err in sustaining the demurrer? We so hold.
While in the present case defendant designated his further pleading as a “Cross Action,” it is nothing more than a further defense. “The allegation of the defective title is a matter of defense and not of counterclaim.” Ba nk v. Loughran, 122 N. C., 668, 30 S. E., 17; C. S., 543; Hughes v. McNider, 90 N. C., 248; Fitzgerald v. Shelton, 95 N. C., 519.
“As to matter set up as defense the usual ground of demurrer is its insufficiency, and this may be taken by a formal demurrer or demurrer ore ienus.” McIntosh, 507, sec. 475.
“Th…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.