Legal Opinion

Toler v. . French

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The question: Did the court err in sustaining the demurrer? We so hold.

While in the present case defendant designated his further pleading as a “Cross Action,” it is nothing more than a further defense. “The allegation of the defective title is a matter of defense and not of counterclaim.” Ba nk v. Loughran, 122 N. C., 668, 30 S. E., 17; C. S., 543; Hughes v. McNider, 90 N. C., 248; Fitzgerald v. Shelton, 95 N. C., 519.

“As to matter set up as defense the usual ground of demurrer is its insufficiency, and this may be taken by a formal demurrer or demurrer ore ienus.” McIntosh, 507, sec. 475.

“Th…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API